Library

The writings of the Apostolic Fathers

Footnotes

Project Gutenberg EPUB edition Clement I, Pope, Hermas, active 2nd century, Ignatius, Saint, Bishop of Antioch, Papias, Saint, Bishop of Hierapolis, Polycarp, Saint, Bishop of Smyrna, Crombie, Frederick, Donaldson, James, Sir, and Roberts, Alexander

Source notes

Open passage
521. Not found in Scripture. Comp. Isa.xl. 13; Prov. i. 6. Hilgenfeld, however, changes the usual punctuation, which places a colon after prophet, and reads, “For the prophet speaketh the parable of the Lord. Who shall understand,” etc.
Open passage
522. The Greek is here very elliptical and obscure: “His Spirit” is inserted above, from the Latin.
Open passage
524. Cod. Sin. has “our fair formation.”
Open passage
526. Cod. Sin. inserts, “the Lord says.”
Open passage
528. Not in Scripture, but comp. Matt.xx. 16, and 2 Cor. v. 17.
Open passage
531. Cod. Sin. inserts “Himself;” comp. John i. 14.
Open passage
534. Cod. Sin. omits “He says.”
Open passage
535. Cod. Sin. omits “in the midst.”
Open passage
537. Cod. Sin. has, “But we said above.”
Open passage
539. These are specimens of the “Gnosis,” or faculty of bringing out the hidden spiritual meaning of Scripture referred to before. Many more such interpretations follow.
Open passage
540. Cod. Sin. reads “temple,” which is adopted by Hilgenfeld.
Open passage
541. Not to be found in Scripture, as is the case also with what follows. Hefele remarks, that “certain false traditions respecting the Jewish rites seem to have prevailed among the Christians of the second century, of which Barnabas here adopts some, as do Justin (Dial. c. Try. 40) and Tertullian (adv. Jud. 14; adv. Marc. iii. 7).”
Open passage
543. Cod. Sin. reads, “what commanded He?”
Open passage
544. Cod. Sin. reads, “one as a burnt-offering, and one for sins.”
Open passage
545. Cod. Sin. reads, “type of God,” but it has been corrected to “Jesus.”
Open passage
546. In Cod. Sin. we find “Rachel.” The orthography is doubtful, but there is little question that a kind of bramble-bush is intended.
Open passage
547. Thus the Latin interprets; others render “shoots.”
Open passage
548. Cod. Sin. has “thus” instead of “this.”
Open passage
550. The text is here in great confusion, though the meaning is plain. Dressel reads, “For how are they alike, and why [does He enjoin] that the goats should be good and alike?” The Cod. Sin. reads, “How is He like Him? For this that,” etc.
Open passage
551. Cod. Sin. here inserts “the goat.”
Open passage
552. Cod. Sin. reads, “for as he who ... so, says he,” etc.
Open passage
554. Literally, “men in whom sins are perfect.” Of this, and much more that follows, no mention is made in Scripture.
Open passage
555. Cod. Sin. has “upon sticks,” and adds, “Behold again the type of the cross, both the scarlet wool and the hyssop,”—adopted by Hilgenfeld.
Open passage
556. Cod. Sin. has, “the law is Christ Jesus,” corrected to the above.
Open passage
557. The Greek text is, “then no longer [sinful] men, no longer the glory of sinners,” which Dressel defends and Hilgenfeld adopts, but which is surely corrupt.
Open passage
558. Literally, “in witness of the tribes.”
Open passage
560. Thus the sense seems to require, and thus Dressel translates, though it is difficult to extract such a meaning from the Greek text.

Source attribution

The writings of the Apostolic Fathers, Project Gutenberg eBook #77576

INDEX OF TEXTS.