The Book of Enoch: its Component Parts and their Dates

Project Gutenberg EPUB edition Charles, R. H. (Robert Henry)
Open passage
The Book of Enoch is now usually designated 1 Enoch, to distinguish it from the later Apocalypse, The Secrets of Enoch, known as 2 Enoch. The former is also called the Ethiopic Enoch, the latter the Slavonic Enoch, after the languages of the earliest versions extant of each respectively. No manuscript of the original language of either is known to be in existence.
Open passage
According to Canon Charles, the various elements of which our book in its present form is made up belong to different dates. The following table will show the dates of the different parts of the book. Canon Charles believes that these are approximately correct, without committing himself to the certainty of this in each case:
Open passage
The oldest pre-Maccabæan
Open passage
“The Apocalypse of Weeks.”
Open passage
vi.-xi., liv. 7-lv. 2, lx., lxv.-lxix. 25, cvi., cvii.
Open passage
Fragments of “The Book of Noah.”
Open passage
Pre-Maccabæan at the latest.
Open passage
“The Book of the Heavenly Luminaries.”
Open passage
“The Parables,” or “Similitudes.”
Open passage
The latest portion, but pre-Christian.
Open passage
Chapter cv, which consists of only two verses, cannot be dated; while cviii. is in the nature of an appendix, probably added subsequently, to the whole work.
Open passage
While these dates may be regarded as approximately correct, it should be pointed out that differences of opinion exist among scholars on the subject. Schürer holds, for example, that, with the exception of chapters xxxvii.-lxxi. (the “Parables,” or “Similitudes”), the entire book belongs to the period 130-100 B.C.; the “Parables” he assigns to a time not earlier than Herod the Great. Beer thinks that the “Dream-Visions” (chapters lxxxiii.-xc.) belong to the time of John Hyrcanus (135-105 B.C.), and he includes under the pre-Maccabæan portions only xci. 12-17, xcii. xciii. 1-14; and holds that the rest of the book was written before 64 B.C. Dalman maintains that it cannot be proved that the important section xxxvii.-lxxi. (the “Similitudes”) is “the product of the pre-Christian period,” though he fully recognizes its Jewish character, Burkitt regards the writer as “almost contemporary” with the philosopher Posidonius (135-51 B.C.). There is thus some diversity of opinion as to the date of the book among leading authorities. That it is, as a whole, pre-Christian, may be regarded as definitely established. More difficult is the question whether any portions of it are pre-Maccabæan; Charles gives various reasons for his belief that considerable parts are pre-Maccabæan; we are inclined to agree with him, though it may be questioned whether the last word on the subject has been spoken.

Source attribution

The book of Enoch, Project Gutenberg eBook #77935

The Apocalyptic Literature Authorship