RETROSPECT. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MATTHEW AND LUKE AS TO THE ORIGINAL RESIDENCE OF THE PARENTS OF JESUS.
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Strauss, David Friedrich and Eliot, George
Source notes
135 Beiträge zur Einleit. in das N. T. 1. s. 217. Comp. Hoffmann, s. 238 f. 277 ff. ↑
136 C. I. 8. 10. ↑
137 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 1, a, s. 178. ↑
138 Ueber die Unzulässigkeit der mythischen Auffassung u. s. f. 1, s. 101. ↑
139 L. J. Ch. s. 33. ↑
140 Tertull. adv. Marcion iv. 8. Epiphan. hær. xxix. 1. ↑
141 Comp K. Ch. L. Schmidt, in Schmidt’s Bibliothek, 3, 1, s. 123 f.; Kaiser, bibl. Theol. 1, s. 230. ↑
142 On this Heydenreich rests his defence, Ueber die Unzulässigkeit. 1. s. 99. ↑
143 Ueber den Lukas, s. 49. There is a similar hesitation in Thelte, Biographie Jesu, § 15. ↑
144 Ueber den Ursprung u. s. w., s. 68 f. u. s. 158. ↑
145 Comp. Ammon. Fortbildung, 1, s. 194 ff.; De Wette, exeget. Handb. 1, 2, s. 24 f.; George, s. 84 ff. That different narrators may give different explanations of the same fact, and that these different explanations may afterwards be united in one book, is proved by many examples in the O. T. Thus in Genesis, three derivations are given of the name of Isaac; two of that of Jacob (xxv. 26., xxvii. 16), and so of Edom and Beersheba (xxi. 31., xxvi. 33). Comp. De Wette, Kritik der mos. Gesch., s. 110. 118 ff. and my Streitschriften, I, 1, s. 83 ff. ↑