Library

A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume...

§ 4. The Remaining European Countries

Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)

Source notes

Open passage
69 Cp. Tullo Massarani, Studii di letteratura e d’arte, 1809, p. 96. ↑
Open passage
73 Burckhardt, p. 464; Owen, p. 180, and refs. ↑
Open passage
74 Owen, p. 181. See the whole account of Guicciardini’s rather confused opinions. ↑
Open passage
75 Though Italy had most of what scientific knowledge existed. Burckhardt, p. 292. ↑
Open passage
76 “A man might at the same time be condemned as a heretic in Spain for affirming, and in Italy for denying, the reality of the witches’ nightly rides” (The Pope and the Council, p. 258). ↑
Open passage
77The Pope and the Council, pp. 249–61. It was another Spina who wrote on the other side. ↑
Open passage
78 F. Fiorentino, Pietro Pomponazzi, 1868, p. 30. ↑
Open passage
79 Owen, pp. 197–98; Renan, Averroès, pp. 353–62; Christie, as cited, p. 133. ↑
Open passage
80 Cp. Owen, pp. 201, 218; Lange, i, 183–87 (tr. i, 220–25). He, however, granted that the mass of mankind, “brutish and materialized,” needed the belief in heaven and hell to moralize them (Christie, pp. 140–41). ↑
Open passage
81 This principle, though deriving from Averroïsm, and condemned, as we have seen, by Pope John XXI, had been affirmed by so high an orthodox authority as Albertus Magnus. Cp. Owen, pp. 211–12, note. While thus officially recognized, it was of course denounced by the devout when they saw how it availed to save heretics from harm. Mr. Owen has well pointed out (p. 238) the inconsistency of the believers who maintain that faith is independent of reason, and yet denounce as blasphemous the profession to believe by faith what is not intelligible by philosophy. ↑
Open passage
82 Owen, pp. 209, note. “Son école est une école de laïques. de médecins, d’esprits forts, de libres penseurs” (Bouillier, Hist. de la philos. cartèsienne, 1854, i, 3). ↑
Open passage
83 Owen. p. 210; Christie, p. 151. ↑
Open passage
87 Gebhart, pp. 59–63; Burckhardt, p. 211. ↑
Open passage
89 Burckhardt, pp. 279–80; Villari, Life of Machiavelli, pp. 106–107. ↑
Open passage
90 Burckhardt, pt. iii, ch. xi. ↑
Open passage
91 Dr. Rashdall, The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, 1895, i, 265. Cp. Renan, Averroès, Avert. ↑
Open passage
92 Schechter, Studies in Judaism, pp. 213, 420–21. ↑
Open passage
93 Notice of Bonaventure Desperiers, by Bibliophile Jacob [i.e. Lacroix], in 1841 ed. of Cymbalum Mundi, etc. ↑
Open passage
94 For a solution of the enigma of the title see the Clef of Eloi Johanneau in ed. cited, p. 83. Cymbalum mundi was a nickname given in antiquity to (among others) an Alexandrian grammarian called Didymus—the name of doubting Thomas in the gospel. The book is dedicated by Thomas Du Clevier à son ami Pierre Tyrocan, which is found to be, with one letter altered (perhaps by a printer’s error), an anagram for Thomas Incrédule à son ami Pierre Croyant, “Unbelieving Thomas to his friend Believing Peter.” Clef cited, pp. 80–85. ↑
Open passage
95 Origen, Against Celsus, vi, 78. ↑
Open passage
96 The readiness of piety in all ages to invent frightful deaths for unbelievers must be remembered in connection with this and other records. Cp. Notice cited, p. xx, and note. The authority for this is Henri Estienne, Apologie pour Hérodote, liv. i, chs. 18, end, and 26. ↑
Open passage
97 So Charles Nodier, cited in the Notice by Bibliophile Jacob, pp. xxiii–xxiv. The English translator of 1723 professed to see no unbelief in the book. ↑
Open passage
98 Perrens, Les Libertins en France au XVIIe siècle, 1896, p. 41. ↑
Open passage
99Notice historique in Bibliophile Jacob’s ed. of Rabelais, 1841; Stapfer, Rabelais, pp. 6, 10; W. F. Smith, biog. not. to his trans. of Rabelais, 1893, i, p. xxii. ↑
Open passage
100 Rathery, notice biog. to ed. of Burgaud des Marets, i, 12. Jacob’s account of his relations with his friends Budé and Amy at this stage is erroneous. See Rathery, p. 14. ↑
Open passage
101 Le Double, Rabelais anatomiste et physiologiste, 1889, pp. 12, 425; and pref. by Professor Duval, p. xiii; Stapfer, p. 42; A. Tilley, François Rabelais, 1907, pp. 74–76. ↑
Open passage
102 In the same year he was induced to publish what turned out to be two spurious documents purporting to be ancient Roman remains. See Heulhard, Rabelais légiste, and Jacob, Notice, p. xviii. ↑
Open passage
105 As to this see Tilley, p. 53. ↑
Open passage
106 See it at the end of the ed. of Bibliophile Jacob. ↑
Open passage
107 Cp. Stapfer, pp. 24–25; Rathery, p. 26. ↑

Source attribution

A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2 Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes, Project Gutenberg eBook #51793

§ 3. The English Evolution § 1. The German Conditions