MISCELLANEOUS INSTRUCTIONS AND CONTROVERSIES OF JESUS.
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Strauss, David Friedrich and Eliot, George
Source notes
14 Schneckenburger, über den Ursprung, s. 29. ↑
15 Ut sup. s. 90, Neander agrees with him, ut sup. ↑
16 The Rabbins also attached weight to these Mosaic blessings and curses, vid. Lightfoot, p. 255. As here we have eight blessings, they held that Abraham had beenblessed benedictionibus septem (Baal Turim, in Gen. xii. Lightfoot, p. 256); David, Daniel with his three companions, and the Messiah, benedictionibus sex. (Targ. Ruth. 3, ibid.) They also counted together with the twenty beatitudines in the Psalms, as many væ in Isaiah. (Midrasch Tehillim in Ps. i. ib.). ↑
17 Schneckenburger, Beiträge, s. 58. Neander tries to show, very artificially, a real connection of thought, s. 157, Anm. ↑
18 Olshausen in loc. The true reading is indicated by Schneckenburger, Beiträge, s. 58; Tholuck, ut sup. s. 11. ↑
19 This cause is overlooked by Schleiermacher, s. 205; comp. De Wette, in loc. ↑
20 Schleiermacher, ut sup. s. 90. Tholuck, s. 21. ↑
21Tholuck, s. 12, 187; De Wette, in loc. ↑
22 Ut sup. 206 f. ↑
23 Comp. De Wette, exeg. Handb. 1, 2, s. 86. ↑
24 De Wette, exeg. Handb. 1, 1, s. 48. ↑
25 Orig. de orat. xviii. and Hess, Gesch. Jesu, 2, s. 48 f. ↑
26 Schleiermacher, ut sup. s. 173; Olshausen, 1, s. 235; Sieffert, s. 78 ff. Neander, s. 235 f. note. ↑
27 Comp. De Wette, exeg. Handb. 1, 1, s. 69. 1, 2, s. 65. ↑
28 N.T. 1, 323. The parallels may be seen in Wetstein and Lightfoot. ↑
29 Comm. in Matt., p. 265. ↑
30 Comp. De Wette, 1, 1, s. 69 ff.; Neander, s. 237 ff. ↑
31 Comp. De Wette, 1, 2, s. 176. ↑
32 From vi. 19 to the end of the chapter even Neander finds no orderly association, and conjectures that the editor of the Greek Gospel of Matthew was the compiler of this latter half of the discourse (p. 169, note). ↑
33 Neander, ut sup.; De Wette, in loc. ↑
34 De Wette, 1, 2, s. 45. ↑
35 De Wette in loc. des Lukas. ↑
36 E.g. Hess, Gesch. Jesu, 1, s. 545. ↑
37 Schulz, ut sup. s. 308, 314; Sieffert, s. 80 ff. ↑
38 Olshausen, in loc. The latter bold assertion in Kern, Über den Ursprung des Evang. Matth., s. 63. ↑
39 Schulz, s. 315. ↑
40 Vid. De Wette, Archäol., § 265, and in loc. ↑
41 Comp. De Wette, exeg. Handb. 1, 1, s. 99. ↑
42 Schulz, s. 308; Sieffert, s. 82 ff. ↑
43 The satisfactory connexion which modern criticism finds throughout the 12th chap. of Luke, I am as little able to discover as Tholuck, Auslegung der Bergpredigt, s. 13 f., who has strikingly exposed the partiality of Schleiermacher for Luke, to the prejudice of Matthew. ↑
44 Vid. De Wette in loc. ↑
45 Schleiermacher, über den Lukas, s. 169 f.; Schneckenburger, über den Ursprung u. s. f., s. 32 f. ↑
46 Comp. De Wette, exeg. Handb., 1, 1, s. 110. 1, 2, s. 62. ↑
47 Schulz, über das Abendmahl, s. 314. ↑
48 Olshausen, bibl. Comm. 1, s. 437. ↑
49 L. J. Chr., s. 175. ↑
50 Schneckenburger, über den Ursprung u. s. f., s. 33. ↑
51 Olshausen, s. 438. ↑
52 Schleiermacher, s. 120. ↑
53 Fritzsche, Comm. in Marc., s. 120, 128, 134; De Wette, in loc. ↑