Library

The origin and development of the moral ideas

CHAPTER XXX

Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition Westermarck, Edward
Open passage
Veracity and probity were conspicuous virtues among various uncivilised peoples belonging to the Russian Empire. Georgi, whose work dates from the eighteenth century, says of the Chuvashes that they “content themselves with a simple affirmation or denial, and always keep their word”;33 of the Barabinzes, that “lying, duplicity, and fraud, are unknown among them”;34 of the Tunguses, that they “always appear to be what they really are,” and that “lying seems to them the absurdest thing in the world, which prevents them being either suspicious or necessitated to accompany their affirmations by oaths or solemn protestations”;35 of the Kurilians, that they always speak the truth “with the most scrupulous fidelity.”36 Castrén states that the Zyrians, like the Finnish tribes generally, are trustworthy and honest,37 and that the Ostyaks have no other oaths but those of purgation. Among them “witnesses never take the oath, but their words are unconditionally believed in, and everybody, with the exception of lunatics, is allowed to give evidence. Children may witness against their parents, brothers against brothers, a husband against his wife, and a wife against her husband.”38
Open passage
The Aleuts were highly praised by Father Veniaminof for their truthfulness:—“These people detest lying, and never spread false rumours…. They are very much offended if any one doubts their word.” They “despise hypocrisy in every respect,” and “do not flatter nor make empty promises, even in order to escape reproof.”39 The regard in which truth is held by the Eskimo seems to vary among different tribes. Armstrong blames the Western Eskimo for being much addicted to falsehood, and for seldom telling the truth, if there be anything to gain by a lie.40 The Point Barrow Eskimo “are in the main truthful, though a detected lie is hardly considered more than a good joke, and considerable trickery is practised in trading.”41 Of the Eskimo at Igloolik, an island near Melville Peninsula, we are told that “their lies consist only of vilifying each other’s character, with false accusations of theft or ill behaviour. When asking questions of an individual, it is but rarely that he will either advance or persist in an untruth…. Lying among them is almost exclusively confined to the ladies.”42 In his description of the Eskimo on the western side of Davis Strait and in the region of Frobisher Bay, Mr.
Open passage
Hall says that they despise and shun one who will shag-la-voo, that is, “tell a lie,” and that they are rarely troubled by any of this class.43 The Greenlanders are generally truthful towards each other, at least the men.44 But if he can help it, a Greenlander will not tell a truth which he thinks may be unpleasant to the hearer, as he is anxious to stand on as good a footing as possible with his fellow-men.45
Open passage
The Thompson River Indians of British Columbia maintain that it is bad to lie, that if you do so people will laugh at you and call you a “liar.”46 Speaking of the Iroquois, Mr. Morgan says that the love of truth was a marked trait of the Indian character. “This inborn sentiment flourished in the period of their highest prosperity, in all the freshness of its primeval purity. On all occasions and at whatever peril, the Iroquois spoke the truth without fear and without hesitation. Dissimulation was not an Indian habit…. The Iroquois prided themselves upon their sacred regard for the public faith, and punished the want of it with severity when an occasion presented itself.”47 Loskiel likewise states that they considered lying and cheating heinous and scandalous offences.48 Among the Chippewas there were a few persons addicted to lying, but these were held in disrepute.49 The Shoshones, a tribe of the Snake Indians, were frank and communicative in their intercourse with strangers, and perfectly fair in their dealings.50 The Seminole Indians of Florida are commended for their truthfulness.51 With special reference to the Navahos, Mr.
Open passage
Matthews observes, “As the result of over thirty years’ experience among Indians, I must say that I have not found them less truthful than the average of our own race.”52 Among the Dacotahs lying “is considered very bad”; yet in this respect “every one sees the mote in his brother’s eye, but does not discover the beam that is in his own,”53 want of truthfulness and habitual dishonesty in little things being prevalent traits in their character.54 So, also, the Thlinkets admit that falsehood is criminal, although they have recourse to it without hesitation whenever it suits their purpose.55 Of the Chippewyans, again, it is said that they carry the habit of lying to such an extent, even among themselves, that they can scarcely be said to esteem truth a virtue.56 The Crees are “not very strict in their adherence to truth, being great boasters.”57 Heriot58 and Adair59 speak of the treacherous or deceitful disposition of the North American Indians; but the latter adds that, though “privately dishonest,” they are “very faithful indeed to their own tribe.”

Source notes

Open passage
20 Man, in Jour. Anthr. Inst. xii. 112.
Open passage
21 Distant, in Jour. Anthr. Inst. iii. 4.
Open passage
22 Kloss, In the Andamans and Nicobars, p. 227 sq.
Open passage
23 Ling Roth, Natives of Sarawak, i. 66-68, 82. Boyle, Adventures among the Dyaks of Borneo, p. 215. Selenka, Sonnige Welten, p. 47.
Open passage
24 Bock, Head-Hunters of Borneo, p. 209.
Open passage
25 Kükenthal, Forschungsreise in den Molukken, p. 188.
Open passage
26 Junghuhn, Battaländer auf Sumatra, ii. 239.
Open passage
27 Crawfurd, History of the Indian Archipelago, i. 50.
Open passage
28 Raffles, History of Java, i. 248.
Open passage
29 Riedel, De sluik- en kroesharige rassen tusschen Selebes en Papua, p. 96 (Serangese). St. John, Life in the Forests of the Far East, ii. 322 (Malays of Sarawak).
Open passage
30 Marsden, History of Sumatra, p. 209 (natives of the interior of Sumatra). Riedel, op. cit. p. 314 (natives of the Luang-Sermata group). Steller, De Sangi-Archipel, p. 23.
Open passage
31 Forbes, A Naturalist’s Wanderings in the Eastern Archipelago, p. 320.
Open passage
32 Modigliani, Viaggio a Nías, p. 467.
Open passage
35Ibid. iii. 78. Cf. ibid. iii. 109.
Open passage
36Ibid. iii. 192. Cf. Krasheninnikoff, History of Kamschatka, p. 236.
Open passage
37 Castrén, Nordiska resor och forskningar, i. 257.
Open passage
39 Veniaminof, quoted by Dall, Alaska, pp. 396, 395.
Open passage
40 Armstrong, Discovery of the North-West Passage, p. 196 sq.
Open passage
41 Murdoch, ‘Ethnological Results of the Point Barrow Expedition,’ in Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethn. ix. 41.
Open passage
42 Lyon, Private Journal during the Voyage of Discovery under Captain Parry, p. 349.
Open passage
43 Hall, Arctic Researches, p. 567.
Open passage
44 Dalager, Grønlandske Relationer, p. 69. Cranz, History of Greenland, i. 171, 175. Nansen, Eskimo Life, p. 158.
Open passage
45 Nansen, Eskimo Life, p. 101. Idem, First Crossing of Greenland, ii. 334 sq.
Open passage
46 Teit, ‘Thompson Indians of British Columbia,’ in Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, Anthropology, i. 366.
Open passage
47 Morgan, League of the Iroquois, pp. 335, 338.
Open passage
48 Loskiel, History of the Mission of the United Brethren among the Indians in North America, i. 16.
Open passage
49 Keating, Expedition to the Source of St. Peter’s River, ii. 168.
Open passage
50 Lewis and Clarke, Travels to the Source of the Missouri River, p. 306.
Open passage
51 Maccauley, ‘Seminole Indians of Florida,’ in Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethn. v. 491.
Open passage
52 Matthews, ‘Study of Ethics among the Lower Races,’ in Jour. of American Folk-Lore, xii. 5.
Open passage
53 Schoolcraft, Indian Tribes of the United States, ii. 196.

Source attribution

The origin and development of the moral ideas, Project Gutenberg eBook #52106

THE REGARD FOR TRUTH AND GOOD FAITH Before CHAPTER XXXI THE REGARD FOR TRUTH AND GOOD FAITH (concluded)