Library

The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-Paramita

INTRODUCTION

Project Gutenberg EPUB edition Unknown, Gemmell, William, and Kumārajīva

Source notes

Open passage
11 Compare the Chinese text of the Chi-Sin-Pien—The Awakening of Faith.
Open passage
12 In the preface to The Vagrakkhedika.
Open passage
13 “Supreme spiritual wisdom.” In Beal’s Kin-Kong-King, “The unsurpassed, just, and enlightened heart.” (Sanscrit, “Annuttara Samyak Sambodhi Hridaya.”)
Open passage
14 According to the text of The Diamond Sutra, the intellect of Sakyamuni Buddha sank so profoundly into the past, that he was enabled to speak confidently of his experiences in previous incarnations. (Compare pp. 56, 57.)
Open passage
15 From the text adopted by Mr H. Oelsner, M.A., Ph.D., for The Temple Classics.
Open passage
16 Dr Edkins, in his scholarly work Chinese Buddhism, seems to have regarded “the Law or body of doctrine” as an accurate definition of Dharma.
Open passage
Dr Eitel, in his Handbook of Chinese Buddhism, explained Dharma by “Fah”—“Law”; and observed that it is “a general term for religious objects, especially for the Buddhistic Canon.”
Open passage
Mr Vincent A. Smith, in Asoka, Buddhist Emperor of India, suggested that the Chinese Hsiao (piety), and the Latin Pietas, coincide with the Sanscrit term Dharma.
Open passage
17 The Chinese phrase is “Fah-sing-chen-ru-hai.”
Open passage
18See the Tao-Teh-Ching. Compare, also, the statement attributed to Confucius—“Nature and Truth cannot be adequately expressed.”
Open passage
20 Compare The Light of Asia. Perhaps this aspect of the “Law” of Buddha may be conceived of as harmonising with Shakespeare’s idea of a “Divinity.”
Open passage
21 It may be interesting to observe that, according to our Chinese text, Sakyamuni Buddha evidently disclaimed any desire to formulate, or to perpetuate, a stereotyped system of “Law” or “doctrine.” Sakyamuni Buddha also made it plain, that the “Law” which he enunciated, was presented before the minds of his disciples in the simile of a “raft”—a thing to be abandoned when the mind “touched the further shore” of everlasting truth. It seems to be in this tentative sense that intellectual Buddhists regard all ecclesiastical institutions, priesthoods, dogmas, ordinances, etc.; and we have met monks who would classify belief in the “efficacy” of religious rites or ceremonies, with obnoxious forms of “heresy” and “immorality.” (Compare Rhys Davids’ Buddhism.) With regard to the Buddhist objection concerning the “efficacy” of religious “rites,” compare the noble sentiments expressed in the following lines, delightfully rendered by Sir Edwin Arnold from the Bhagavad-Gita (The Song Celestial):—
Open passage
Sway of the silent spirit, constant stress
Open passage
To sanctify the nature,—these things make
Open passage
Good rite, and true religiousness of mind.”
Open passage
22 Max Müller suggests that Samgna and Dharma “correspond in many respects to the Vedantic Namarupe”—in Chinese Ming-Seh—name, form, or characteristic.
Open passage
28 Some modern Japanese Buddhists appear to regard this purely spiritual element as “essence of mind.”
Open passage
29 From the preface to The Vagrakkhedika.
Open passage
31 Compare the interesting dialogue entitled The Enlightenment of Ananda, in which Sakyamuni instructs his distinguished disciple in ideas concerning the subjective and objective phenomena of mind.
Open passage
33 Bodhisattvas—greatly enlightened disciples.
Open passage
34Vidya Matra Siddhi, a philosophical work by Vasubandhu, a native of Radjagriha, and disciple of Nagarjuna, founder of the Mahayana school. (Compare Eitel’s Handbook of Chinese Buddhism.)
Open passage
35 Compare the process of reasoning which permeates the entire Diamond Sutra. We hope no injustice is done to our Japanese friends, by applying to their beautiful concept “essence of mind,” this familiar logical method of Sakyamuni Buddha.
Open passage
36 Fah-Shen—the Law, or spiritual body. Compare Shen-Shen, the term usually employed in the Chinese rendering of the New Testament Scriptures to denote the spiritual body.
Open passage
37 Gatha—usually a Scripture verse comprising four lines.
Open passage
38 Compare the following lines from The Song Celestial.—
Open passage
Whose mind is cheated by the show of things.”
Open passage
39 In Buddhist phraseology, Yuen-Chioh means the study, by means of contemplation, of primary spiritual causes.
Open passage
40 Compare Beal’s rendering in the Kin-Kong-King, “Tathagata is the explanation as it were of all systems of Law.” See also The Book of the Manifesting of the One and Manifold in The Song Celestial, the verse commencing:—

Source attribution

The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-Paramita, Project Gutenberg eBook #64623

PREFACE Chapter 1