CHAPTER IV. (continued 3)
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Strauss, David Friedrich and Eliot, George
Source notes
81 Michaelis, s. 117. ↑
82 Michaelis, s. 146.—Celsus stumbled at this difference respecting the number of the angels, and Origen replied that the Evangelists mean different angels: Matthew and Mark the one who had rolled away the stone, Luke and John those who were commissioned to give information to the women, c. Cels. v. 56. ↑
83 Paulus, in loc. Matth. ↑
84 I subjoin the table sketched by the Fragmentist (ut sup. s. 477 f.)
“1.Luke xxiv. 12: Peter ran to the grave, ἔδραμεν. John xx. 4: Peter and John ran, ἔτρεχον.
2.Luke v. 12: Peter looked in, παρακύψας. John v. 5: John looked in, παρακύψας.
3.Luke v. 12: Peter saw the clothes lying alone, βλέπει τὰ ὀθόνια κείμενα μόνα. John v. 6, 7: Peter saw the clothes lie, and the napkin not lying with the clothes: θεωρεῖ τὰ ὀθόνια κείμενα, καὶ τὸ σουδάριον οὐ μετά τῶν ὀθονίων κείμενον.
4.Luke v. 12: Peter went home, ἀπῆλθε πρὸς ἑαυτὸν. John v. 10: Peter and John went home again, ἀπῆλθον πάλιν πρὸς ἑαυτούς.”
85 Kuinöl, in Matth., p. 800 f. ↑
86 Progr. de fontibus, unde Evangelistæ suas de resurrectione Domini narrationes hauserint. Opusc. acad. ed. Gabler, Vol. 2, p. 241 ff. ↑
87 Comp. Schneckenburger, ut sup. s. 64 f., Anm. ↑
88 On this subject comp. De Wette, exeg. Handb. 1, 1, s. 245; Ammon, Fortbildung des Christenthums zur Weltreligion, 2, 1, s. 6; Theile, zur Biogr. Jesu, § 37. ↑
89 Schulz, über das Abendmahl, s. 321 f.; Schneckenburger, ut sup. s. 61 ff. ↑
90 Vol. II. § 74. ↑
91 Concerning this sense of ἐπίστευσεν, and its not being contradicted by οὔπω γὰρ ἤδεισαν τὴν γραφὴν κ.τ.λ. (v. 9), see the correct view in Lücke, in loc. ↑
92 Weisse is of a different opinion, ut sup. s. 355, Anm. ↑
93 As Paulus, Fritzsche, Credner, Einleitung, 1, § 49. Comp. De Wette, exeg. Handb. 1, 2, s. 199 f. A middle view in Hug, Einl. in d. N. T. 2, § 69. ↑
94 Orig. c. Cels. v. 52: ὁ γὰρ τοῦ θεοῦ παῖς, ὡς ἕοικεν. οὐκ ἐδύνατο ἁνοῖζαι τὸν τάφον, ἁλλα’ ἑδεήθη ἄλλου ἀποκινήσοντος τὴν πέτραν. ↑
95 Schuster, in Eichhorn’s allg. Biblioth. 9, s. 1034 ff.: Kuinöl, in Matth., p. 779. ↑
96 Friedrich, über die Engel in der Auferstehungsgeschichte. In Eichhorn’s allg. Bibl. 6, s. 700 ff. Kuinöl, ut sup. ↑
97 Thus a treatise in Eichhorn’s allg. Bibl. 8, s. 629 ff., and in Schmidt’s Bibl. 2, s. 545 f.; also Bauer, hebr. Myth. 5, s. 259. ↑
98 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 829, 55, 60, 62. ↑
99 Fritzsche, in Marc. in loc., Nemo—quispiam primi temporis Christianis tam dignus videri poterat, qui de Messia in vitam reverso nuntium ad homines perferret, quam angelus, Dei minister, divinorumque consiliorum interpres et adjutor. Then on the differences in relation to the number of the angels, etc.: Nimirum insperato Jesu Messiæ in vitam reditui miracula adjecere alii alia, quæ Evangelistæ religiose, quemadmodum ab suis auctoribus acceperant, literis mandârunt. ↑
100 Kaiser, bibl. Theol. 1, s. 254 ff. ↑
101 In Lessing’s Beiträgen, ut sup. s. 485. ↑
102 Michaelis, s. 259 f.; Kuinöl, in Luc., p. 743. ↑
103 Schleiermacher, über den Lukas, s. 299 f.; Paulus, s. 910. ↑
104 Ut sup. s. 486. ↑
105 Griesbach, Vorlesungen über Hermeneutik des N. T., mit Anwendung auf die Leidens- und Auferstehungsgeschichte Christi, herausgegeben von Steiner, s. 314. ↑
106 Duplik, Werke, 6 Bd. s. 352. ↑
107 Schneckenburger, über den Urspr. des ersten kanon. Evang., s. 17 f. ↑
108 Exeg. Handb. 3, b. s. 835. ↑
109 Bibl. Comm. 2, s. 524. ↑
110 This is done by Schulz, über das Abendm. s. 321; Schneckenburger, ut sup. ↑
111 On which account Michaelis, s. 118 f., is of opinion that εἶπεν was the original reading in Matthew also. Comp. Weisse, die Evang. Gesch. 2, s. 347 f. ↑
112 Vol. I. § 57. ↑
113 The opinion that the true locality of the appearances of the risen Jesus before the disciples was Galilee, is concurred in by Weisse, 2, s. 358 ff.; but in accordance with his fundamental supposition concerning the synoptical gospels, he gives the preference to the narrative of Mark before that of Matthew. ↑
114 Vid Billroth’s Commentar, in loc. ↑
115 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b. s. 897; Olshausen, 2, s. 541. ↑
116Hieron. de viris illustr. ii.: Evangelium quoque, quod appellatur secundum Hebræos,—post resurrectionem Salvatoris refert: Dominus autem, postquam dedisset sindonem servo sacerdotis (apparently in relation to the watch at the grave, which is here represented as a sacerdotal instead of a Roman guard; vid. Credner, Beiträge zur Einl. in das N. T. s. 406 f.), ivit ad Jacobum et apparuit ei. Juraverat enim Jacobus, se non comesturum panem ab illa hora, qua biberat calicem Domini, donec videret eum resurgentum a dormientibus (on the inconceivableness of such a vow, despairing as the disciples were, comp. Michaelis, s. 122). Rursusque post paululum: Afferte, ait Dominus, mensam et panem. Statimque additur Tulit panem et benedixit ac fregit, et dedit Jacobo justo et dixit ei: frater mi, comede panem tuum, quia resurrexit filius hominis a dormientibus. ↑