Library

Mythology among the Hebrews and Its Historical Development

INDEX. (continued 2)

Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition Goldziher, Ignác and Martineau, R. (Russell)

Source notes

Open passage
614. Movers, Die Phönizier, II. 2. 439 et seq.
Open passage
615. Histoire générale des langues sémitiques, p. 200.
Open passage
616. See my Studien über Tanchûm Jeruschalmi, Leipzig 1870, p. 12.
Open passage
617. Die Semiten in ihrem Verhâltniss zu Chamiten und Japheiten, Basel 1872, p. 134.
Open passage
618. This question will be found very satisfactorily discussed in Stade’s article ‘Erneute Prüfung des zwischen dem Phönicischen und Hebräischen bestehenden Verwandtschaftsverhältnisses,’ in the Morgenländische Forschungen, Leipzig 1875, pp. 169–232.
Open passage
619. See Merx, Archiv. f. wissensch. Erforsch. d. A. T. pt. 1. 1867, p. 108.
Open passage
620. In late Aramaised Hebrew we find the feminine kehantâ (= kôheneth) for a Priest’s Wife, equivalent to êsheth kôhên; see Levy, Chald. Wörterb. I. 356 a. It comes thence to be used in a general signification, of an honest, irreproachable woman, in opposition to pundâḳîth, properly an innkeeper, in Mishnâ Yebhâmôth, XVI. 7.
Open passage
621. See Ernst Meier’s essay on the former in Zeitsch. d. D. M. G., 1865, XIX., and Nathan Davis, Carthage and her remains, London 1861.
Open passage
622. Die geschichtlichen Bücher des A. T., Leipzig 1866.
Open passage
623. Bibelkritisches, in the Zeitsch. d. D. M. G., 1873, XXVII. 682–89, especially the theses 22–26. Zunz appears to have laboured independently of Graf, but arrives at almost the same results.
Open passage
624. Bargés, who has earned great credit for his elucidation of the Marseilles table in several writings, disputes the authenticity of the inscription discovered by Davis (Examen d’une nouvelle inscription phénicienne découverte récemment dans les ruines de Carthage et analogue à celle de Marseille. Paris 1868).
Open passage
626. Geschichte der Juden, Leipzig 1874, I. 407 et seq.
Open passage
627. See Stade’s exhaustive exposition in the Morgenländische Forschungen, p. 197. But I cannot share the opinion of my respected friend, that the Hebrews could borrow nothing from the Phenicians because the two nations passed through a completely distinct religious and political development.
Open passage
628. Shefaṭ-ʿAdad in Nabatean, quoted by Ernst Meier in Zeitsch. d. D. M. G. 1873, XVII. 609, is also problematical.
Open passage
629. Duncker, Geschichte des Alterthums, I. 371.
Open passage
630. The data belonging to this subject are lucidly brought together in Kuenen’s Religion of Israel, I. 182.
Open passage
631. Semiten, Chamiten und Japhetiten, p. 160 et seq.
Open passage
632. Equally exaggerated on the other side, however, is Tiele’s view (Vergelijk. Geschied., p. 182), treating the story of Samson as borrowed from the Canaanites. See also Duncker, l.c. II. 65.
Open passage
633. This fact, moreover, refutes Buckle’s thesis (assuming the very opposite course of development), which makes history to be the earlier, and to be subsequently degraded to ‘a mythology full of marvels.’ This thesis has been estimated at its true value by Hermann Cohen in an article entitled Die dichterische Phantasie und der Mechanismus des Bewusstseins, in the Zeitsch. für Völkerpsychologie etc., 1869, VI. 186–193.
Open passage
634. Mommsen, l.c. book III. chap 1.
Open passage
635. Holtzmann, Deutsche Mythologie, p. 28.
Open passage
636. Paul Gyulai, Vörösmarty élete [Life of Vörösmarty], Pest 1866, p. 49 et seq.
Open passage
638. Godgeleerde Bijdragen, 1866, p. 983 et seq. With him Kuenen agrees, The Religion of Israel, I. 311 et seq.
Open passage
639. Like the Hungarian national hero Nicolas Toldi, who overcomes the Czech (Bohemian) hero in single combat.
Open passage
640. Compare Genesis rabbâ, § 48.
Open passage
641. See Shâhnâmeh (ed. Mohl), p. 124. vv. 121–29 and pp. 139–40, etc.
Open passage
642. Hartung, in the first part of his Religion und Mythologie der Griechen, contradicts himself again and again on this subject. At first he makes monotheism precede all development of religion (p. 3), then he sees nothing religious at all in monotheism (p. 28), and next the growth of religion proceeds from polytheism to monotheism, not the reverse way (p. 32).
Open passage
643. Waitz, Anthropologie der Naturvölker, I. 363 note.
Open passage
644. La Magie chez les Chaldéens, p. 72.
Open passage
645. Annales de la Philosophie chrétienne, an 1858, p. 260.
Open passage
646. Essays, Moral, Political and Literary, ed. Green and Grose, vol. II. p. 311; compare Buckle’s History of Civilisation in England, in 3 vols. vol. I. p. 251; Pfleiderer, Die Religion und ihre Geschichte, II. 17. Before Hume the view that Polytheism was a degradation of a previous Monotheism was generally admitted. But Hume’s exposition did not put an end to this radically false idea. Creuzer’s great work, Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen, is based on this false assumption, and Schelling’s Philosophy of Religion starts from the same premiss. And many able English scholars still speak again and again of the degradation of the primeval Monotheism into Polytheism. Not only one-sided theologians start from this axiom; Gladstone’s mythological system, in his Studies on Homer and the Homeric Age, and Juventus Mundi is founded upon it, all progress in history, philology and mythology notwithstanding.
Open passage
647. In Virchow and Holtzendorff’s Sammlung gemeinverständlicher wissenschaftlicher Vorträge, 1870, Heft 97, p. 20.
Open passage
648. Polit. I. 1. 7: καὶ τοὺς θεοὺς δὲ διὰ τοῦτο πάντες φασὶ βασιλεύεσθαι, ὅτι καὶ αὐτοι, οἱ μὲν ἔτι καὶ νῦν, οἱ δὲ τὸ ἀρχαῖον ἐβασιλεύοντο· ὥσπερ δὲ καὶ τὰ εἴδη ἑαυτοῖς ἀφομοιοῦσιν οἱ ἄνθρωποι, οὕτω καὶ τοὺς βίους τῶν θεῶν. Waitz, Anthropologie der Naturvölker, I. 466, says: ‘Considering the multitude of superhuman beings, it is certainly very natural to follow the analogy of human relations, which is often carried out with great consistency, and to assume gradations of power among them, one being regarded as the first and highest of all. But this idea may easily be rendered unfruitful through the very analogy which suggested it, because in human society the power and repute of individuals are frequently changing.’ But even this fact is not unfruitful with regard to religion; for on this analogy a world of gods with a head liable to change may be imagined.
Open passage
649. Schelling’s Sämmtliche Werke (Cotta’s edition, 1856), II. Abth. I, 52 (Einleitung in die Philosophie der Mythologie).
Open passage
651. Palgrave, Central and Eastern Arabia, I. 33.
Open passage
652. Von Holtzendorff in the Zeitsch. für Völkerpsychologie etc., 1868, V. 378.

Source attribution

Mythology among the Hebrews and Its Historical Development, Project Gutenberg eBook #48967

INDEX. (continued 1) INDEX. (continued 3)