CHAPTER IV. (continued 3)
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Strauss, David Friedrich and Eliot, George
Source notes
41 Rosenmüller, Schol. in V. T. 7, 4, p. 340. ↑
42 Vid. ap. Rosenmüller, in loc.; Schöttgen, 2, p. 221; Bertholdt, § 17, not. 12. ↑
43 Comp. Joseph, b. j. iv. v. 2. Sanhedrin, vi. 5, ap. Lightfoot, p. 499. ↑
44 Vid. Lipsius, de cruce, L. II. cap. 14. ↑
45 Comp. Winer, 1, s. 802. ↑
46 Sanhedrin, ap. Lightfoot, p. 499. ↑
47 Ulpian, xlviii. 24, 1 ff. ↑
48 Vol. II. § 80. ↑
49 Michaelis, Begräbniss- und Auferstehungsgeschichte, s. 68 ff. ↑
50 Thus Grotius; Less, Auferstehungsgeschichte, s. 165. ↑
51 See the fifth Fragment, in Lessing’s viertem Beitrag zur Geschichte und Literatur, s. 467 f. Comp. concerning these differences also Lessing’s Duplik. ↑
52 Michaelis, ut sup. s. 102 ff. ↑
53 Kuinöl, in Luc. p. 721. ↑
54 Thus Tholuck, in loc. ↑
55 See the Fragments, ut sup. s. 469 ff. ↑
56 Michaelis, ut sup. s. 99 f.; Kuinöl and Lücke leave open the choice between this expedient and the former. ↑
57 Comp. De Wette, in loc. Matth. ↑
58 Michaelis, ut sup. s. 45 ff. ↑
59 Kuinöl, in Matth. p. 786; Hase, § 145; Tholuck, Comm. s. 320. ↑
60 A confusion of the κῆπος garden near to the place of execution, where according to John Jesus was buried, with the garden of Gethsemane, where he was taken prisoner, appears to have given rise to the statement of the Evang. Nicodemi, that Jesus was crucified ἐν τῷ κήπῳ, ὅπου ἐπιάσθη in the garden where he was apprehended, C. ix. p. 580, ap. Thilo. ↑
61Τῇ ἐπαύριον, ἥτις ἐστὶ μετὰ τὴν παρασκευὴν (the next day, that followed the day of the preparation), is certainly a singular periphrasis for the sabbath, for it is a strangely inappropriate mode of expression to designate a solemn day, as the day after the previous day: nevertheless we must abide by this meaning so long as we are unable to evade it in a more natural manner than Schneckenburger in his chronology of the Passion week, Beiträge, s. 3 ff. ↑
62 The former, ut sup. s. 437 ff.; the latter in the exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 837 ff. Comp. Kaiser, bibl. Theol. 1, s. 253. ↑
63 Michaelis, Begräbniss- und Auferstehungsgeschichte, s. 206; Olshausen 2, s. 506. ↑
64 Michaelis, ut sup. ↑
65 Olshausen overlooks the latter point when he (ut sup.) says the watch had not received the command to prevent the completion of the interment. ↑
66 Olshausen indeed is here still so smitten with awe, that he supposes Pilate to have been penetrated with an indescribable feeling of dread on hearing this communication from the Sanhedrists, s. 505. ↑
67 Olshausen, s. 506. ↑
68 Michaelis, ut sup. s. 198 f. ↑
69 Stroth, in Eichhorn’s Repertorium, 9, s. 141. ↑
70 Kern, über den Ursprung des Ev. Matth. Tüb. Zeitschrift, 1834, 2, s. 100 f.; comp. 123. Compare my Review, Jahrbücher f. wiss. Kritik, Nov. 1834; now in the Charakteristiken u. Kritiken, s. 280. ↑
71 Hase, L. J., § 145. ↑
72 Comp. Theile, zur Biogr. Jesu, § 37; Weisse, die Evang. Gesch. 2, s. 343 f. ↑
73 Comp. Theile, ut sup. ↑
74 Comp. Fritzsche, in loc., and Kern, Tüb. Zeitschr. 1834, 2, s. 102 f. ↑
75 Kuinöl, in Marc. p. 194 f. ↑
76 Michaelis, ut sup. s. 112. ↑
77 Schneckenburger, über den Urspr. des ersten kanon. Evang., s. 62 f. Comp. the Wolfenbüttel Fragmentist in Lessing’s viertem Beitrag, s. 472 ff. On the other hand, Lessing’s Duplik, Werke, Donauösch. Ausg. 6. Thl. s. 394 f. ↑
78 De Wette, in loc. ↑
79 Michaelis, s. 150 ff. ↑
80 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 825. ↑