§ 104. (continued 1)
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Strauss, David Friedrich and Eliot, George
Source notes
41 Justin Mart. dial. c. Tryph. lxxxv. ↑
42 Exeg. Handb. 1, 6, s. 422; L. J. 1, a, s. 128. ↑
43 Bibl. Comm. i. 296. ↑
44 Comp. Bertholdt, Christol. Jud. §§ 36–41. ↑
45 According to Pesikta in Jalkut Schimoni ii. f. lvi. 3 (s. Bertholdt, p. 185). Satan recognizes in the same manner the pre-existing Messiah at the foot of the throne of God with terror, as he qui me et omnes gentiles in infernum præcipitaturus est. ↑
46 Fritzsche, in Marc., p. 35: In multis evangeliorum locis homines legas a pravis dæmonibus agitatos, quum primum conspexerint Jesum, eum Messiam esse, a nemine unquam de hac re commonitos, statim intelligere. In qua re hac nostri scriptores ducti sunt sententia, consentaneum esse. Satanæ satellites facile cognovisse Messiam, quippe insignia de se supplicia aliquando sumturum. ↑
47 A favourite resort of maniacs, vid. Lightfoot and Schöttgen, in loc., and of unclean spirits, vid. rabbinical passages, ap. Wetstein. ↑
48 The notion that the cutting himself with stones which Mark ascribes to the demoniac, was an act of penance in lucid moments, belongs to the errors to which Olshausen is led by his false opinion of a moral and religious point of view in relation to these phenomena. It is well known, however, that the paroxysms of such disorders are precisely the occasions on which a self-destructive fury is manifested. ↑
49 Vid. the collection of such explanations, ap. Fritzsche, in Matt., p. 327. ↑
50 Thus Schulz, über das Abendmahl, s. 309; Paulus, in loc. Hase, L. J. § 75. ↑
51 Schulz, ut sup. ↑
52 Schleiermacher, über den Lukas, s. 127. ↑
53 Paulus, L. J. 1, a, s. 232. ↑
54 Vid. Fritzsche, in Matt., p. 329. ↑
55 Natürliche Geschichte, 2, 174. ↑
56 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 1, 473; Olshausen, s. 302. ↑
57 This even Paulus, s. 474, and Olshausen, s. 303, find surprising. ↑
58 It is the narrative of the manner in which Apollonius of Tyana unmasked a demon (empusa), vit. Ap. iv. 35; ap. Baur, s. 145. ↑
59 Ut sup. s. 128. When, however, he accounts for this incorrect supplement of Luke’s by supposing that his informant, being engaged in the vessel, had remained behind, and thus had missed the commencement of the scene with the demoniac, this is too laboured an exercise of ingenuity, and presupposes the antiquated opinion, that there was the most immediate relation possible between the evangelical histories and the facts which they report. ↑
60 S. 305, Anm. ↑
61 Clem. Horn. ix. 10. ↑
62 Fritzsche, in Matth., p. 332. According to Eisenmenger, 2, 447 ff., the Jews held that demons generally had a predilection for impure places, and in Jalkut Rubeni f. x. 2. (Wetstein) we find this observation: Anima idololatrarum, quæ venit a spiritu immundo, vocatur porcus. ↑
63 Ut sup. s. 474, 485. Winer, b. Realw. 1, s. 192. ↑
64 Fritzsche, in Matth., s. 330. ↑
65 Paulus, ut sup. s. 475 f. ↑
66 Olshausen, s. 307. ↑
67 Paulus, s. 474. ↑
68 Paulus, s. 485; Winer, ut sup. ↑
69 Olshausen, ut sup. ↑
70 Ibid. ↑
71 Ullmann, über die Unsündlichkeit Jesu, in seinen Studien, 1, 1, s. 51 f. ↑
72 Olshausen, ut sup. ↑
73 Paulus. ↑
74 Ullmann. ↑
75 E.g. Woolston, Disc. 1, p. 32 ff. ↑
76 Jamblich. vita Pythag. no. 36. ed. Kiessling. ↑
77 In the Abhandlung über genetische oder formelle Erklärungsart der Wunder in Henke’s Museum, 1, 3, s. 410 ff. ↑
78 Exeg. Beiträge, 2, 109 ff. ↑
79 Antiq. viii. ii. 5. ↑
80 Philostr. v. Ap. iv. 20; ap. Baur, ut sup. s. 39. ↑