BODILY INJURIES
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Westermarck, Edward
Conquest, a man might lose his tongue by bringing a false and scandalous accusation.81 In the seventeenth century a person in Scotland was sentenced to have his tongue bored because he had libelled the Lord Justice General.82 In German and Austrian codes we find, even in the eighteenth century, traces of the principle of punishing the offending member;83 and in France the last survival of it—the amputation of the right hand of a parricide before his execution—disappeared only in 1832.84 Growing refinement of feeling has made people averse from the use of surgery in the administration of justice; and in most European countries grown-up offenders are no longer liable to corporal punishment of any kind.85
Corporal punishment has generally been, by preference, a punishment for poor and common people or slaves.86 Blows and abusive language, says Plutarch, seem to be more fitting for slaves than the freeborn.87 According to the religious law of the Hindus, a Brâhmana shall not suffer corporal punishment for any offence.88 Among the Hebrews89 and Muhammedans,90 among the Romans91 and in the Middle Ages,92 the punishment of mutilation could generally be commuted to a fine. For a long period, in Christian Europe, as well as in Pagan Rome during the Empire,93 the punishment was more savage in proportion as the delinquent was more helpless. “En crimes,” says Loysel, “les villains sont plus griévement punis en leurs corps que les nobles…. Et où le vilain perdroit la vie, ou un membre de son corps, le noble perdra l’honneur, et réponse en cour.”94 Indeed, whilst the slave incurred the penalty of mutilation for the most trifling offence, the noble might be exempted from corporal punishment of any kind.95 In a similar manner the social status of a person has influenced his right to bodily integrity with reference to judicial torture.
According to the Chinese Penal Code, “it shall not, in any tribunal of government, be permitted to put the question by torture to those who belong to any of the eight privileged classes, in consideration of the respect due to their character.”96 In Rome, under the Republic, torture was exclusively confined to the slaves.97 In mediæval Christendom it was made use of to an extent and with a cold-blooded ferocity unknown to any heathen nation, and in cases of heresy and treason it was applied to every class of the community.98 But the tortures inflicted on the nobles and the clergy were lighter than in the case of ordinary laymen, and proof of a more decided character was required to justify their being exposed to torment.99 “Noble persons and persons of quality,” says Dumoulin, “cannot so easily be subjected to torture as persons who are of mean and plebeian rank.”100 Guazzini, an eminent Italian jurisconsult and a recognised expositor of the law of torture in the days of its highest ascendency and ripest maturity, observes that the torment inflicted on a person shall be proportionate to his age, his physical constitution, his mental habits, and his social status;101 and he adds that bishops and others in high civil dignity are exempt from torture even under strong presumptions of guilt.102
Source notes
65Supra, p. 178. See also Laws of Ḫammurabi, 196, 197, 200; Exodus, xxi. 24 sq.; Leviticus, xxiv. 19 sq.; Deuteronomy, xix. 21; Koran, v. 49; Sachau, op. cit. p. 762 sq. (Muhammedan law); Leist, Alt-arisches Jus Gentium, p. 426 sq. (Greeks); Lex Duodecim Tabularum, viii. 2; Günther, Idee der Wiedervergeltung, p. 186 sqq. (Teutons).
66 For its occurrence in modern Persia, see Polak, Persien, i. 256, 329 sq.; in Fez, see Leo Africanus, History and Description of Africa, ii. 470. The Koran (v. 42) orders theft to be punished by cutting off the hands of the thief, but this punishment is now seldom practised in Muhammedan countries. Among the lower races I have met only with a few instances of punishing the offending member. In Ashanti intrigue with the female slaves of the royal household is punished by emasculation (Ellis, Tshi-speaking Peoples of the Gold Coast, p. 287); and the Kamchadales burn the hands of people who have been frequently caught in theft (Krasheninnikoff, op. cit. p. 179).
67Laws of Ḫammurabi, 192, 194, 195, 218, 226, 253.
68Laws of Manu, viii. 270-272, 279-283, 322, 334, 374; xi. 105.
69 Günther, op. cit. i. 94 sqq.
70Ibid. i. 155 sqq.
71Ibid. i. 195 sqq. Wilda, op. cit. p. 510. Grimm, Deutsche Rechtsalterthümer, p. 740.
72 Du Boys, Histoire du droit criminel des peuples modernes, ii. 699. Idem, Histoire du droit criminel de l’Espagne, p. 94. Cibrario, Economia politica del medio eve, i. 346 sq.
73Laws of Alfred, ii. 25.
74 Bracton, De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliæ, fol. 147, vol. ii. 480 sq.
75Laws of Cnut, ii. 54.
76Laws of Æthelstan, 14.
77 Strutt, View of the Manners, Customs, &c., of the Inhabitants of England, iii. 43.
78 Erskine, Principles of the Law of Scotland, p. 571.
79 Stemann, op. cit. p. 645. Charles V.’s Peinliche Gerichts Ordnung, art. 107, p. 235. Pollock and Maitland, History of English Law before the Time of Edward I. ii. 453. Günther, op. cit. ii. 57.
80 Du Boys, Histoire du droit criminel des peuples modernes, ii. 699. Idem, Histoire du droit criminel de l’Espagne, p. 599 sq. Pitcairn, Criminal Trials in Scotland, iii. 539.
81 Pollock and Maitland, op. cit. ii. 539.
82 Rogers, Social Life in Scotland, ii. 35.
83 Günther, op. cit. ii. 55-57, 65; iii. 79.
84 Chauveau and Hélie, Théorie du Code Pénal, iii. 394.
85 See von Liszt, Le droit criminel des états européens, passim; Wrede, Die Körperstrafen bei allen Völkern, passim.
86 See, for instance, the Laws of Manu, viii. 267, 279.
87 Plutarch, De educatione puerorum, 12.
88Baudhâyana, i. 10. 18. 17. Institutes of Vishnu, v. 2.
89 Günther, op. cit. i. 55.
90Ibid. i. 74 sq. Lane, Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, p. 120. Sachau, op. cit. p. 764. According to Muhammedan law, it is not obligatory for the injured party to accept compensation in lieu of mutilation.
91 Günther, op. cit. i. 124 sqq. Mommsen, Römisches Strafrecht, p. 981.
92 Du Boys, Histoire du droit criminel des peuples modernes, ii. 557 sq. Strutt, op. cit. ii. 8.
93Cf. Mackenzie, Studies in Roman Law, p. 414 sq.
94 Loysel, Institutes coutumières, vi. 2. 31 sq., vol. ii. 219 sq.
95 Du Boys, Histoire du droit criminel de l’Espagne, p. 469.
96Ta Tsing Leu Lee, sec. cccciv. p. 441.
97 Mommsen, Römisches Strafrecht, p. 405.
98 Suarez de Paz, Praxis ecclesiastica et secularis, v. 1. 3. 12, fol. 154 b. Cf. Lecky, Rise and Influence of the Spirit of Rationalism in Europe, i. 328.
99 Lea, Superstition and Force, p. 526 sq.
100 Dumoulin, quoted by Welling, ‘Law of Torture,’ in The American Anthropologist, v. 210 sq.
101 Guazzini, Tractatus ad defensam inquisitorum, xxx. 4. 24, vol. ii. 86.