Library

The Writings of St. Francis of Assisi

Appendix

Paschal Robinson historical translation and scholarly apparatus, 1905–1906 edition Francis of Assisi and Paschal Robinson

Source notes

Open passage
[528] For example Papini La Storia di S. Francesco, t. I, p. 130, n. 8, Grisar, see Civilta Cattolicà, fasc. 1098 (1896), p. 723; Mgr. Faloci Pulignani, Misc. Franc., t. VI (1895), p. 34; Fr. Edouard d’Alençon, La Benediction de St. François; M. Sabatier, Spec. Perf., pp. lxvii-lxx; Reginald Balfour, The Seraphic Keepsake; and Montgomery Carmichael,La Benedizione di San Francesco. See also Fr. Saturnino da Caprese, O.F.M., Guida Illustrate della Verna (Prato, 1902), p. 93. On the testimony of three leading German palæographers, Wattenbach, Dziatzko and Meyer, see Theol. Literatur-Zeitung, Leipzig, 1895, PP. 404 and 627.
Open passage
[529] Says Celano: “The sign thau was more familiar to him than other signs. With it only he signed sheets for despatch and he painted it on the walls of the cells anywhere.” SeeTr. de Miraculis, in Anal. Boll., t. xviii, pp. 114-115.
Open passage
[530] “He signed it upon all the letters he directed.” See Bonav. Leg. Maj., IV, 3.
Open passage
[532] From this point to the end of the Praises the autograph is illegible.
Open passage
[534] Mr. Balfour points out that the position of. Leo’s name in relation to the thau is intentional and that the thau thus becomes a cross of blessing, St. Francis, following the practice of all old Missals and Breviaries, having placed it so as to divide the name of the person blessed. See The Seraphic Keepsake, p. 106.
Open passage
[537] See on this head Ozanam, Les Poètes Franciscains, p. 82, and Matthew Arnold, Essays on Criticism, pp. 243-248. Mr. Arnold’s translation of the Canticle is well known.
Open passage
[538] For a list of the more important studies on it, see Speculum Perfectionis (ed. Sabatier), p. 289; L. Suttina, Appunti bibliografici di studi francescani, p. 19; also Gasparry’sItalian Literature to the death of Dante, p. 358.
Open passage
[542] This text was published by Fr. Panfilo da Magliano, O.F.M., in his Storia Compendiosa, also by M. Sabatier in his Vie de S. François and later in his Speculum, pp. 334-35.
Open passage
[543] Professor Boehmer published the text of the Maz. MS. 1350 in his Sonnengesang v. Fr. d’A., in 1871.
Open passage
[544] I have had the advantage of studying two of the oldest MSS. of this work known,—those of the convents of La Verna and Portiuncula.
Open passage
[545] It was soon after the canonization of St. Clare, about 1256, that Celano undertook the task of compiling this legend by order of Alexander IV.
Open passage
[549] See Opuscules, t. I, p. 55. This MS. contains only the first part of the Office; it ends with the words the “Lord hath reigned.”
Open passage
[550] See above, p. 3-4. Other MSS. containing the Office are enumerated by Wadding. See also Boehmer’s Analekten.
Open passage
[551] The Oxford Codex here reads “until Easter Sunday.”
Open passage
[552] “Et toto conatu fuerunt solliciti annulare scripta beati patris nostri Francisci, in quibus sua intentio de observantia regulae declaratur.”—See Archiv., III, pp. 168-169.
Open passage
[553] We need not despair of finding others; the Clares’ archives have mostly escaped spoliation.
Open passage
[554] See Spec. Perf. (ed. Sabatier), c. 108, and ed. Lemmens, c. 18. See also the Conformities (I, fol. 185)
Open passage
[556] See 1 Cel. 82. See also Leg III Soc., 67, where the Incipit of the letters is given.
Open passage
[557] De Adventu Minorum in Angliam. See Mon. Germ. Hist., Script., t. XXVIII, p. 563, and Anal. Franc., t. I, p. 232, note 4. See also Fr. Cuthbert’s translation of Eccleston, p. 64.
Open passage
[558] Prof. Herkless in his Francis and Dominic, p. 54, cites some passages from a letter which St. Francis “wrote to his friends at Bologna “ in 1228. One searches in vain for any trace of such a letter among the early collections of St. Francis’ writings.
Open passage
[563] Die Quellen, etc., p. 20. He places its composition between 1222 and 1225.
Open passage
[565] In the Liegnitz MS. and the Vatican Codex 4354 the present letter is addressed fratri Antonio episcopo meo, which corresponds with the direction given by Celano (2 Cel. 3, 99).
Open passage
[566] On this letter see also Papini (Storia, t. I, p. 118, n. 1), Müller (Anfänge, p. 103), Lempp (Zeitschrift, t. XII, pp. 425, 438), Lepitre (S. Antoine, p. 73), and de Kerval (S. Antonii, etc., p. 259, n. 1).
Open passage
[567] Another less well known letter to St. Antony, giving him permission “to build a church near the city wall of Patti,” is sometimes attributed to St. Francis. But the text is most improbable and gives rise to colossal historic difficulties. See Lepitre, S. Antoine, p. 120, note, and Fr. Edouard d’Alençon, Etudes Franc., t. XII, p. 36r.

Source attribution

Historical edition on Global Grey. Paschal Robinson historical translation and scholarly apparatus, 1905–1906 edition

6. The Office Of The Passion