RELATION OF THE CRITICAL AND SPECULATIVE THEOLOGY TO THE CHURCH.
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Strauss, David Friedrich and Eliot, George
Source notes
28 For the different views, see Bretschneider, Dogm. 2, s. 353, systematische Entwicklung, § 107. ↑
29 Röhr, Briefe, s. 36, 405 ff. ↑
30 Schleiermacher, on his Glaubenslehre, to Dr. Lücke, 2tes Sendschreiben, Studien, 2, 3, s. 481 ff. ↑
31 Glaubenslehre, 2, §§ 92–105. ↑
32 This opinion has been already put forth in the most noted reviews of Schleiermacher’s system; comp. Braniss, über Schleiermacher’s Glaubenslehre; H. Schmid, über Schl. Glaubensl. s. 263 ff.; Baur, die christl. Gnosis, s. 626 ff., and the Review of Rosenkranz, Jahrb. fur wiss. Kritik, 1831. ↑
33 2ter Sendschreiben. ↑
34 Schmid, ut sup. ↑
35 Comp. Rosenkranz, ut sup. s. 935 ff. ↑
36 Baur, ut sup. s. 653. ↑
37 Thus Schmid, ut sup. s. 267. ↑
38 Ep. 21, ad Oldenburg. Opp. ed. Gfrörer, p. 556:—dico, ad salutem non esse omnino necesse, Christum secundum carnem noscere; sed ed æterno illo filio Dei, h. e. Dei æterna sapientia, quæ sese in omnibus rebus, et maxime in mente humana, et omnium maxime in Christo Jesu manifestavit, longe aliter sentiendum. Nam nemo absque hac ad statum beatitudinis potest pervenire, utpote quæ sola docet, quid verum et falsum, bonum et malum sit. ↑
39 Religion innerhalb der Gränzen der blossen Vernunft. drittes Stück, 1te Abthl. vii. ↑
40 Ut sup. 2tes Stück, 1ter Abschn. 3tes Stück, 1te Abthlg. ↑
41 This is shown by Baur, christl. Gnosis, s. 660 ff. ↑
42 Censur des christl. protestantischen Lehrbegriffs, 3, s. 180. ↑
43 Religion und Theologie, 2ter Abschnitt, Kap. 3; comp. bibl. Dogmatik, § 255; kirchliche, § 64 ff. ↑
44 Ideen über Mythologie u. s. w. in Henke’s neuer Magazin, b. s. 454 ff. Comp. Henke’s Museum, 3, s. 455. ↑
45 Vorlesungen über die Methode des akademischen Studiums, s. 192. ↑
46 Hegel’s Phänomenologie des Geistes, s. 561 ff.; Vorlesungen über die Philos. der Relig. 2, s. 234 ff. Marheineke, Grundlehren der christl. Dogmatik. s. 174 ff. Rosenkranz, Encyklopädie der theol. Wissenschaften, s. 38 ff., 148 ff.; comp. my Streitschriften, 3tes Heft, s. 76 ff. ↑
47 Dogmatik, § 326. ↑
48 Encyklopädie, s. 160. ↑
49 Selbstbewusstsein und Offenbarung, s. 295 f. Comp. Bauer, Recens. des L. J., Jahrbücher f. wiss. Kritik, 1836, Mai, s. 699 ff. ↑
50 Compare with this my Streitschriften, 3 Heft, s. 68 ff. 125. ↑
51 With this should be compared the explanation in the Streitschriften, ut sup. s. 119. ↑
52 Of this also there is an explanation in the Streitschriften, 3, s. 166 f. ↑
53 Herein lies the answer to the objection which Schaller (der historische Christus und die Philosophie, s. 64 ff.) has made to the above view; namely, that it teaches only a substantial, not a personal unity of man with God. That unity which exists in the determination of the race has already been present in individuals separately, according to the different measure of their religious development, and thus the substantial unity has become, in different degrees, a personal unity. ↑
54Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion, 2, s. 263 ff. Compare the collection of the several propositions of Hegel on the person of Christ and the evangelical history, in my Streitschriften, 3. Heft, s. 76. ↑
55 Glaubenslehre, 1, s. 47. ↑
56 In the 2ten Sendschreiben on his Glaubenslehre. ↑