*11. THEORY OF TWO APPARENT VARIABLES.
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Whitehead, Alfred North and Russell, Bertrand
Summary of *11.
In this number, the propositions proved for one variable in *10 are to be extended to two variables, with the addition of a few propositions having no analogues for one variable, such as *11·2·21·23·24 and *11·53·55·6·7. "" stands for a proposition containing and containing ; when and are unassigned, is a propositional function of and . The definition *11·01 shows that "the truth of all values of " does not need to be taken as a new primitive idea, but is definable in terms of "the truth of all values of ." The reason is that, when is assigned, becomes a function of one variable, namely , whence it follows that, for every possible value of , "(" embodies merely the primitive idea introduced in *9. But "(" is again only a function of one variable, namely , since has here become an apparent variable. Hence the definition *11·01 below is legitimate. We put:
*11·01. (
*11·02. (
*11·03. (
*11·04. (
*11·05.
*11·06.
All the above definitions are supposed extended to any number of variables that may occur.
The propositions of this section can all be extended to any finite number of variables; as the analogy is exact, it is not necessary to carry the process beyond two variables in our proofs.
In addition to the definition *11·01, we need the primitive proposition that "whatever possible argument may be, is true whatever possible argument may be" implies the corresponding statement with and interchanged. Either may be taken as the meaning of " is true whatever possible arguments and may be."
The propositions of the present number are somewhat less used than those of *10, but some of them are used frequently. Such are the following:
*11·1.
*11·11. If is true whatever possible arguments and may be, then ( is true.
These two propositions are the analogues of *10·1·11.
*11·2.
I.e. to say that "for all possible values of , is true for all possible values of " is equivalent to saying "for all possible values of , is true for all possible values of ."
*11·3.
This is the analogue of *10·21.
*11·32.
I.e. "if always implies , then ' always' implies ' always.'" This is the analogue of *10·21. *11·33·34·341 are respectively the analogues of *10·271·28·281, and are also much used.
*11·35.
I.e. if always implies , then if is ever true, is true. This is the analogue of *10·23.
*11·45.
This is the analogue of *10·35.
*11·54.
This proposition is useful because it analyses a proposition containing two apparent variables into two propositions which each contain only one. "" is a function of two variables, but is compounded of two functions of one variable each. Such a function is like a conic which is two straight lines: it may be called an "analysable" function.
*11·55.
I.e. to say "there are values of and for which is true" is equivalent to saying "there is a value of for which is true and for which there is a value of such that is true."
*11·6.
This gives a transformation which is useful in many proofs.
*11·62.
This transformation also is often useful.
*11·01. (
*11·02. (
*11·03. (
*11·04. (
*11·05.
*11·06.
with similar definitions for any number of variables.