Library

A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume...

Chapter XVIII (continued 1)

Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)

Source notes

Open passage
1 Cp. Pusey, Histor. Enquiry into the Probable Causes of the Rationalist Character ... of the Theology of Germany, 1828, p. 79. ↑
Open passage
2 Bishop Hurst, History of Rationalism, ed. 1867, p. 56. ↑
Open passage
3Id. pp. 57–58 (last ed. pp. 74–76), citing Tholuck, Deutsche Universitäten, i, 145–48, and Dowding, Life of Calixtus, pp. 132–33. ↑
Open passage
6 Cp. Buckle, 1-vol. ed. pp. 303–309. “The result of the Thirty Years’ War was indifference, not only to the Confession, but to religion in general. Ever since that period, secular interests decidedly occupy the foreground” (Kahnis, Internal History of German Protestantism, Eng. tr. 1856, p. 21). ↑
Open passage
7 Quoted by Bishop Hurst, ed. cited, p. 60 (78). ↑
Open passage
8Preservatio wider die Pest der heutigen Atheisten. ↑
Open passage
9 Dated from Rome; but this was a mystification. ↑
Open passage
10 Kahnis, p. 125; La Croze, Entretiens, 1711, p. 401. ↑
Open passage
11 Even Knutzen seems to have been influenced by Spinoza. Pünjer, Hist. of the Christ. Philos. of Religion, Eng. tr. i, 437. Pünjer, however, seems to have exaggerated the connection. ↑
Open passage
12 Cp. Lange, Gesch. des Materialismus, 3te Aufl. i, 318 (Eng. tr. ii, 35). ↑
Open passage
13Epistolæ ad Spinozam et Responsiones, in Gfrörer, liii. ↑
Open passage
14 Colerus, Vie de Spinoza, in Gfrörer’s ed. of the Opera, 1830, pp. lv, lvi. ↑
Open passage
15 Pünjer, as cited, i, 434–30: Lange, last cit. Lange notes that Genthe’s Compendium de impostura religionum, which has been erroneously assigned to the sixteenth century, must belong to the period of Kortholt’s work. ↑
Open passage
16 Pünjer, p. 439; Lange, last cit.; Tholuck, Kirch. Leben, 2 Abth. pp. 57–58. ↑
Open passage
17 It was nominally issued at Amsterdam, really at Berlin. ↑
Open passage
18 This writer gives (p. 12) a notable list of the forms of atheism: Atheismus directus, indirectus, formalis, virtualis, theoreticus, practicus, inchoatus, consummatus, subtilis, crassus, privativus, negativus, and so on, ad lib. ↑
Open passage
19 Cp. Buckle and his Critics, pp. 171–72; Pünjer, i, 515. ↑
Open passage
20 Letter cited by Dr. Latta. Leibniz, 1898, p. 2, note. ↑
Open passage
21Philos. Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, i, 26; Martineau, Study of Spinoza, p. 77. ↑
Open passage
22 Letter to Thomas, December 23, 1670. ↑
Open passage
23 Quoted by Tholuck, as last cited, p. 61. Spener took the same tone. ↑
Open passage
24Philos. Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, i, 34; ii, 563; Latta, p. 24; Martineau, p. 75. Cp. Refutation of Spinoza by Leibnitz, ed. by Foucher de Careil. Eng. tr. 1855. ↑
Open passage
25 His notable surmise as to gradation of species (see Latta, pp. 38–39) was taken up among the French materialists, but did not then modify current science. ↑
Open passage
26 The only lengthy treatise published by him in his lifetime. ↑
Open passage
27 M. A. Jacques, intr. to Œuvres de Leibniz, 1846, i, 54–57. ↑
Open passage
28 Cp. Tholuck, Das kirchliche Leben, as cited, 2 Abth. pp. 52–55. Kahnis, coinciding with Erdmann, pronounces that, although Leibnitz “acknowledges the God of the Christian faith, yet his system assigned to Him a very uncertain position only” (Int. Hist. of Ger. Protestantism, p. 26). ↑
Open passage
29 Cp. Pünjer, i, 509, as to his attitude on ritual. ↑
Open passage
30 Latta, as cited, p. 16; Vie de Leibnitz, par De Jaucourt, in ed. 1747 of the Essais de Théodicée, i, 235–39. ↑
Open passage
31 As to his virtual deism see Pünjer, i, 513–15. But he proposed to send Christian missionaries to the heathen. Tholuck, as last cited, p. 55. ↑
Open passage
32Lettres entre Leibnitz et Clarke. ↑
Open passage
33Discours de la conformité de la foi avec la raison, §§ 68–70; Essais sur la bonté de Dieu, etc., §§ 50, 61, 164, 180, 292–93. ↑
Open passage
34 The Nouveaux Essais sur l’Entendement humain, refuting Locke, appeared posthumously in 1765. Locke had treated his theistic critic with contempt. (Latta, p. 13.) ↑
Open passage
35 Amand Saintes, Hist. crit. du Rationalisme en Allemagne, 1841, ch. vi; Heinrich Schmid, Die Geschichte des Pietismus, 1863, ch. ii. ↑
Open passage
36 Saintes, p. 51; cp. Pusey, p. 105, as to “the want of resistance from the school of Pietists to the subsequent invasion of unbelief.” ↑
Open passage
37 Hagenbach, German Rationalism, Eng. tr. 1865, p. 9. ↑
Open passage
38Id. p. 39; Pusey, Histor. Enquiry into the Causes of German Rationalism, 1828, pp. 88, 97; Tholuck, Abriss einer Geschichte des Umwälzung ... seit 1750 auf dem Gebiete der Theologie in Deutschland, in Vermischte Schriften, 1839, ii, 5. ↑
Open passage
40 Cp. Pusey, pp. 37–38, 45, 48, 49, 53–54, 79, 101–109; Saintes, pp. 28, 79–80; Hagenbach, pp. 41, 72, 105. ↑

Source attribution

A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 2 of 2 Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes, Project Gutenberg eBook #52160

GERMAN FREETHOUGHT IN THE SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES § 1. Holland