CHAPTER III. (continued 3)
Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition
Strauss, David Friedrich and Eliot, George
Source notes
41 Vid. the Review of Usteri’s Comm. crit., in Winer’s and Engelhardt’s n. krit. Journal, 2, s. 359 ff. ↑
42 Hase, L. J., § 134; Lücke, 2, s. 591 f., Anm. ↑
43 Against the offence which it has pleased Tholuck (Glaubw. s. 41) to take at this expression (Verwischen), comp. the Aphorismen zur Apologie des Dr. Strauss und seines Werkes, s. 69 f. ↑
44 L. J. 1, b, s. 165 f. ↑
45 Vom Zweck J. und seiner Jünger, s. 124. ↑
46 2, s. 588 f. ↑
47 Ut sup. ↑
48 Vid. Lücke, in loc.; Hase, L. J., § 135. ↑
49 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 567. ↑
50 Lücke, 2, s. 599; Hase, ut sup.; Olshausen, 2. s. 435. ↑
51 How can Lücke explain the omission of the kiss of Judas in the Gospel of John from its having been too notorious a fact? and how can he adduce as an analogous instance the omission of the transaction between the betrayer and the Sanhedrim by John? for this, as something passing behind the scenes, might very well be left out, but by no means an incident which, like that kiss, happened so conspicuously in the foreground and centre of the scene. ↑
52 So says the Jew of Celsus, Orig. c. Cels. ii. 9: ἐπειδὴ ἡμεῖς ἐλέγξαντες αὐτὸν καὶ καταγνόντες ἠστιοῦμεν κολάζεσθαι, κρυπτόμενος μὲν καὶ διαδιδράσκων ἐπονειδιστότατα ἑάλω. When we, having convicted and condemned him, had determined that he should suffer punishment; concealing himself, and endeavouring to escape, he experienced a most shameful capture. ↑
53 Lücke, 2, s. 597 f.; Olshausen, 2, s. 435; Tholuck, s. 299. The reference to the murderer of Coligny is, however, unwarranted, as any one will find who will look into the book incorrectly cited by Tholuck: Serrani commentatorium de statu religionis et reip. in regno Galliæ, L. x. p. 32, b. The murderer was not in the least withheld from the prosecution of his design by the firmness of the noble old man. Comp. also Schiller, Werke, 16 Bd. s. 382 f., 384; Ersch and Gruber’s Encyclopädie, 7 Band, s. 452 f. Such inaccuracies in the department of modern history cannot indeed excite surprise in a writer who elsewhere (Glaubwürdigkeit, s. 437) speaks of the duke of Orleans, Louis Philippe’s father, as the brother of Louis XVI. How can a knowledge so diversified as that of Dr. Tholuck be always quite accurate. ↑
54 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 570. ↑
55 Ibid. ↑
56 As Lücke, Tholuck and Olshausen, in loc. ↑
57 Schleiermacher, über den Lukas, s. 290. ↑
58 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 576. ↑
59 Paulus, ut sup. s. 577; Olshausen, 2, s. 244. ↑
60 Thus e.g. Erasmus, in loc. ↑
61 Thus Winer, N. T. Gramm., § 41, 5; Tholuck and Lücke, in loc. ↑
62 Winer, Gramm., § 57, 4. ↑
63 Thus Schleiermacher, über den Lukas, s. 295. ↑
64 Schleiermacher, ut sup.; comp. Fritzsche, in loc. Matth. ↑
65 Vol. II. § 67. Vol. III. § 114. ↑
66 Ut sup. ↑
67 Matthew does not mention the blindfolding, and appears to imagine that Jesus named the person who maltreated him, whom he saw, but did not otherwise know. ↑
68 Vid. Gesenius, in loc. ↑
69Matth. xxvi. 63; comp. Mark xiv. 61: ὁ δὲ Ἰ. ἐσιώπα.
Matth. xxvii. 12: οὐδὲν ἀπεκρίνατο.
Matth. xxvii. 14; comp. Mark xv. 5: καὶ οὐκ ἀπεκρίνατο αὐτῷ πρὸς οὐδὲ ἓν ῥῆμα, ὥστε θαυμάζειν τὸν ἡγεμόνα λίαν.
Luke xxiii. 9: αὐτὸς δὲ οὐδὲν ἀπεκρίνατο αὐτῷ.
John xix. 9: ὁ δὲ Ἰ. ἀπόκρισιν οὐκ ἔδωκεν αὐτῷ. ↑
70 Vol. II. § 74. ↑
71 Thus Schleiermacher, über den Lukas, s. 289; Olshausen, 2, s. 445. ↑
72 Thus Paulus, ut sup. s. 577 f. ↑
73 Comp. Weisse, die evang. Geschichte, 1, s. 609. ↑
74 Bengel, in the Gnomon. ↑
75 Paulus, ut sup. s. 578. ↑
76 Hess, Geschichte Jesu, 2, s. 343. ↑