FOOTNOTES

Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition Foerster, Norman

Source notes

Open passage
[63] From Points of View, 1924, Charles Scribner’s Sons, publisher.
Open passage
[64] From Americans, 1922, Charles Scribner’s Sons, publisher.
Open passage
[65] The rest of the sentence is “and he sees the common weal as the mighty rock in the shadow of which his little life and personality are to be surrendered, if need be, as things negligible and transitory.”
Open passage
[66] Also he could have mastered the philosophy of Mr. John Dewey and made his “religion of democracy” more respectable.
Open passage
[67] A perusal of the Life and Letters of Stuart P. Sherman, published after this essay was written, increases my confidence in the diagnosis above of Sherman’s weaknesses. Mr. P. E. More wondered many years ago whether his young reviewer did not have “an inclination to avoid the central problem.” Later, he warned Sherman: “I do not like to see a man of your ability and insight deliberately taking up the job of whitewasher” for democracy. And finally Mr. More said: “Yours is but a sickly sort of democracy at bottom, and needs a doctor.”
Open passage
[68] From Prejudices: Fourth Series, Alfred A. Knopf, publisher.
Open passage
[69] From The Modern Temper, Harcourt, Brace & Co., publisher.
Open passage
[70] Mr. Lippmann is not a literary critic but his views are pertinent to this discussion.
Open passage
[71] The Macmillan Company, publisher.
Open passage
[72] Even in a footnote I mention Mr. Ludwig Lewisohn with some reluctance, and only because there are so few critics among us who have any interest in trying to plot a direction for the future. Pauline Christianity (grossly libelled by him as akin to the degenerate puritanism of our day) must be destroyed, he preaches. Salvation lies in a fusion of Hellenism (Science) and Judaism (which he interprets selectively and sentimentally). He is a suggestive writer: he is also a prig, a special pleader, and embarrassing in his frequent intervals of self-pity and in his intrusions of hearth-side intimacies (proper for telling only to his closest friends) into the public medium of print. One cannot take this muddled romanticist seriously.
Open passage
[73] In Style and Form in American Prose (1929).

Source attribution

Humanism and America, Project Gutenberg eBook #78119

V I