A History of the Inquisition of Spain; vol. 1

[864] Bibl. nacional, Seccion de MSS., D, 118, fol. 151.

[865] Archivo gén. de la Corona de Aragon, Legajo 528.—For some extracts from this paper see Appendix.

Various papers on both sides of these questions will be found in the Simancas archives, Libro 62, fol. 160, 312.

[866] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 32, fol. 56, 58. (See Appendix.)

[867] Ibidem, Libro 25, fol. 58

[868] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Legajo 1465, fol. 2-8.—MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. 17.

[869] Instrucciones de 1484, § 21. (Arguello, fol. 7.)

[870] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 31, fol. 193, 194. (See Appendix.)

[871] Llorente, Hist. crít. Cap. XXVI, Art. 3. n. 11.

[872] Pablo García, Orden de Procesar, fol. 73.—This is an official manual compiled by the Aragonese secretary of the Suprema. Originally issued about 1568 it was reprinted in 1592, 1607 and 1628. My references are to the last edition.

A somewhat different formula of this oath is given by Páramo, p. 573.

[873] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 688, fol. 514.—MSS. of Bodleian Library, Arch. S, 130.—Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Legajo 1, Lib. 11, fol. 158.

[874] Orden de Procesar, fol. 72.

[875] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 12, fol. 29.—Bibl. nacionale de France, fonds français, 2881, fol. 7

[876] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Sala 39, Leg. 4, fol. 41.

[877] Portocarrero, op. cit., § 1.—Solorzani de Indiar. Gubern., Lib. III, cap. xxiv, n. 16.—Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 1, Lib. 3, fol. 49-69.

[878] Archivo de Simancas, Libro 939, fol. 63.—Cf. Concil. Trident. Sess. xxv, De Reform. cap. 3.—Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca, s. v. Excom. Art. 5, n. 17.

[879] C. Trident, ubi sup.

[880] Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Libro I de copias, fol. 10, 13, 15.—“Et quibuscunque judicibus et personis quibus tibi inhibendum videbitur etiam sub censuris et privationis et inhabilitatis pœnis inhibendi.”

[881] Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Libro IV, fol. 118, 137; Libro V, fol. 117, 136, 138, 151, 199, 200, 251, 264, 295.—Archivo de Simancas, Gracia y Justicia, Leg. 629.

This clause probably explains a peculiarity in the issue of Manrique de Lara’s commission. After the death of Quiroga, Nov. 20, 1594, Clement VIII issued to Manrique, Feb. 10, 1595, a commission subrogating him to Quiroga, with the same powers, for six months until further letters could be made out. Then, August 1, 1595, the full elaborate commission is made out, containing this clause (Bulario, loc. cit., 118, 119). The new clause must have evoked prolonged debate, requiring five months for its settlement.

[882] MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, p. 338.

[883] Páramo, p. 537.—MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, Tom. 17.

[884] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 939, fol. 65; Libro 941, fol. 5; Libro 71, fol. 143.—MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, p. 300.—MSS of Bibl. nacional de Lima, Protocolo 223, Expediente 5270.

[885] MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 318b, p. 302.—Bibl. nacional, Seccion de MSS., D, 118, fol. 170.

[886] Solorzano, De Gubernatione Indiarum, Lib III, Tit. xxiv, n. 53.—MSS. of Bibl. nacional de Lima, Protocolo 228, Expediente 5287.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Legajo 1465, fol. 63.

[887] Archivo gén. de la C. de Aragon, Leg. 528, n. 2.

[888] MSS. of Bodleian Library, Arch. S, 130.—Cartas de Jesuitas (Memorial hist. español, XVII, 70-75).—Juan Gomez Bravo, Catálogo de los Obispos de Córdova, p. 643.

[889] Ariño, Sucesos de Sevilla, pp. 103, 105; Appendix (Sevilla, 1873).—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 937, fol. 220.

[890] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 1465, fol. 46.—Archivo de Alcalá, Hacienda, Leg. 5442, Libro 8.

[891] Portocarrero, op. cit., § 57.

[892] Cap. 9 in Sexto, Lib. V, Tit. ii.

[893] Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 4, n. 3, fol. 25.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 688, fol. 289.

[894] MS. penes me.

[895] Archivo gén. de la C. de Aragon. Leg. 528, n. 23.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 21, fol. 140.

[896] Gratiani Decreti P. II, Caus. XVII, Q, IV, c. 29.

[897] Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Libro I de copias, fol. 139.—Archivo de Alcalá, Hacienda, Legajo 1049.

For some reason a similar brief was obtained from Paul V, November 29, 1606.—Archivo de Alcalá, loc. cit.

[898] Bullar. Roman. II, 198.

This was by no means allowed to be a dead letter in Italy. In 1590 we chance to hear of the Inquisitor of Cremona relaxing to the secular arm three offenders under the bull. In some cases however of wounding or threatening witnesses, the galleys were substituted for capital punishment. There was, moreover, a spirit of conciliation in the Roman Inquisition offering a marked contrast to that of Spain. When, in 1635, at Macerata, some laymen were arrested for wounding certain officials of the tribunal and a question arose as to jurisdiction, the Congregation ordered the civil governor to try the cases as its delegate and not to apply the bull Si de protegendis, as the wounding had not arisen out of hostility to the Holy Office.—Decreta Sacr. Congr. Sti Officii, pp. 34, 202 (R. Archivio di Stato in Roma, Fondo Camerale, Congr. del S. Offizio, Vol. 3).