Library

The Principles of Psychology, Volume 2 (of 2)

THE NEURAL PROCESS WHICH UNDERLIES IMAGINATION?

Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition James, William

Source notes

Open passage
At last even this fails to revive them.
Open passage
Can be exchanged at will for others.
Open passage
Cannot violate the necessary laws of
Open passage
appearance of their originals—e.g.,
Open passage
(with closed eyes) is dark, contracted,
Open passage
The attention seems directed forwards
Open passage
In imagining, the attention feels as
Open passage
Finally, Fechner speaks of the impossibility of attending to both after-images and imagination-images at once, even when they are of the same object and might be expected to combine. All these differences are true of Fechner; but many of them would be untrue of other persons. I quote them as a type of observation which any reader with sufficient patience may repeat. To them may be added, as a universal proposition, that after-images seem larger if we project them on a distant screen, and smaller if we project them on a near one, whilst no such change takes place in mental pictures.
Open passage
[56] [I am myself a good draughtsman, and have a very lively interest in pictures, statues, architecture and decoration, and a keen sensibility to artistic effects. But I am an extremely poor visualizer, and find myself often unable to reproduce in my mind's eye pictures which I have most carefully examined.—W. J.]

Source attribution

The Principles of Psychology, Volume 2 (of 2), Project Gutenberg eBook #57634

INDIVIDUALS DIFFER IN IMAGINATION. PERCEPTION AND SENSATION COMPARED.