Library

The Life of Jesus Critically Examined (4th ed.)

§ 104. (continued 1)

Project Gutenberg EPUB3 edition Strauss, David Friedrich and Eliot, George

Source notes

Open passage
1 See the passages quoted in the first volume, Introd. § 14, notes 9, 10, to which may be added 4 Esdr. xiii. 50 (Fabric. Cod. pseudepigr. V. T. ii. p. 286), and Sohar Exod. fol. iii. col. 12 (Schöttgen, horæ, ii. p. 541, also in Bertholdt’s Christol. § 33, note 1). ↑
Open passage
2 See the rabbinical passages quoted in the 1st vol. ut sup. ↑
Open passage
3 That the σεληνιαζόμενοι associated with them by Matthew are only a particular species of demoniacs, whose malady appeared to be governed by the changes of the moon, is proved by Matt. xvii. 14 ff. where a δαιμόνιον is expelled from a σεληνιαζόμενος. ↑
Open passage
4 Compare the passages of ancient physicians, ap. Winer, bibl. Realwörterb. 1, s. 191. ↑
Open passage
5 Rabbinical and other passages, ap. Winer, ut sup. s. 192. ↑
Open passage
6 Exeg. Handb. 1, b, s. 475; comp. Hase, L. J. s. 60. ↑
Open passage
8 Grätz, Comm. z. Matth. 1, s. 615. ↑
Open passage
9 B. Comm. 1, s. 424. According to this, the passage relates to the Jewish people, who before the exile were possessed by the devil in the form of idolatry, and afterwards in the worst form of Pharisaism. ↑
Open passage
10 Thus Fritzsche, in Matt., p. 447. ↑
Open passage
12 Ut sup. 1, b, s. 483; 2, s. 96. ↑
Open passage
13 Hence the words δαιμονᾷν, κακοδαιμονᾷν were used as synonymous with μελανχολᾷν μαίνεσθαι. Hippocrates had to combat the opinion that epilepsy was the effect of demoniacal influence. Vid. Wetstein, s. 282 ff. ↑
Open passage
14 Let the reader compare the רוּחַ רָעָה מֵאֵת יְהוָֹה, which made Saul melancholy, 1 Sam. xvi. 14. Its influence on Saul is expressed by בִּעֲתַתּוּ. ↑
Open passage
15 Vid. Creuzer, Symbolik, 3, s. 69 f.; Baur, Apollonius von Tyana und Christus, s. 144. ↑
Open passage
17 Antiq. vi. xi. 2. On the state of Saul. ↑
Open passage
19Vitæ Apollon. iv. 20, 25, comp. Baur, ut sup. s. 38 f. 42. Even Aristotle speaks of δαίμονί τινι γενομένοις κατόχοις. de mirab. 166, ed. Bekk. ↑
Open passage
20 Ut sup., bell. j.: τὰ γὰρ καλούμενα δαιμόνια—πονηρῶν ἐστιν ἀνθρώπων πνεύματα, τοῖς ζῶσιν εἰσδυόμενα καὶ κτείνοντα τοὺς βοηθείας μὴ τυνχάνοντας. ↑
Open passage
23 Vid. Eisenmenger, entdecktes Judenthum, 2, s. 427. ↑
Open passage
24 Paulus, exeg. Handb. 2, s. 39; L. J. 1, a, s. 217. He appeals in support of this to Matt. xiv. 2, where Herod, on hearing of the miracles of Jesus, says: It is John the Baptist, he is risen from the dead. In this expression Paulus finds the rabbinical opinion of the עיבור, which is distinct from that of the גלגזל, or transmigration of souls properly so called, (that is, the passage of disembodied souls into the bodies of infants, while in the process of formation), and according to which the soul of a dead person might unite itself to that of a living one, and add to its power (vid. Eisenmenger 2, s. 85 ff.) But, as Fritzsche and others have shown, the word ἠγέρθη refers to an actual resurrection of the Baptist, and not to this rabbinical notion; which, moreover, even were it implied, is totally different from that of demoniacal possession. Here it would be a good spirit who had entered into a prophet for the strengthening of his powers, as according to a later Jewish idea the soul of Seth was united to that of Moses, and again the souls of Moses and Aaron to that of Samuel (Eisenmenger, ut sup.); but from this it would by no means follow, that it was possible for wicked spirits to enter into the living. ↑
Open passage
25 Justin, Apol. ii. 5., Eisenmenger, ut sup. ↑
Open passage
26 Homil. viii. 18 f., ix. 9 f. ↑
Open passage
28 See his Commentatio de dæmoniacis quorum in N. T. fit mentio, and his minute consideration of demoniacal cases. So early as the time of Origen, physicians gave natural explanations of the state of those supposed to be possessed. Orig. in Matth. xvii. 15. ↑
Open passage
31 S. 302, after the example of Paulus, exeg. Handb. 1, b, s. 474. ↑
Open passage
33 Thus Asmodeus chooses Sara and her husband as objects of torment and destruction, not because either the former or the latter were particularly wicked, but because Sara’s beauty attracted him. Tob. vi. 12–15. ↑
Open passage
36 I have endeavoured to present helps towards a scientific conception of the states in question in several essays, which are now incorporated in my Charakteristiken u. Kritiken. Comp. Wirth, Theorie des Somnambulismus. S. 311 ff. ↑
Open passage
37 See note 16, the passage quoted from Lucian. ↑
Open passage
38 Joseph., Antiq. viii. ii. 5. ↑

Source attribution

The Life of Jesus Critically Examined (4th ed.), Project Gutenberg eBook #64037

JESUS CURSES A BARREN FIG-TREE. THE TRANSFIGURATION OF JESUS CONSIDERED AS A MIRACULOUS EXTERNAL EVENT.